29.11.08

DINNER

What is Dinner? Is it something you eat to nourish, or is it something you have been taught to label? Is not eating the act of nourishment of the body, is it it more -- a so-called nourishment of the psyche? When Dinner is used in the aspect of a collective of souls, given in social potency in the transmission of ideas and thinkings, should not your definition of this Dinner be one less constructed of foreign thoughts and ideas? What is not a part is a whole, and what is whole is a part, so far as accumulations and gradations are concerned. If you are not what you eat, perhaps what you eat is what you are. Meaning, if you eat in a manner and of a manner that is part of a historic institution of media monopolies, perhaps your dinner has been prepared by those benefactors, in terms of physical and psychological nourishment. In which case you definitely are what and how you eat, especially given the theory of social transmission. In which case, i would watch what I watch, and what my parent's have watched, and what my children will watch, so as to break any inhumanic cycles.

No comments: