29.11.08
MOOKIE
Mookie. Mookie. What is a Mookie? Is it a name? A person? An idea? Or an omnipotent, transcendental state of Mind. Mookie -- what do all things mookie have in common? I challenge you to Google it -- this thing, this place, this status, known as a Mookie. It is magical and infamous, should only you venture to encounter its embrace. The Mookie is more than a man, the Mookie is a state of earthly consciousness. And it is eqully nothing at all. Nothing more than a name. A mere conjugation of sounds and conjugates and conjugationates. Mookie. What is a Mookie? Who is a Mookie? Look in the mirror, or your local shiny storefront window before a trash can is flying through it, and you will see a Mookie -- both coward and hero and villain and genius and idiot and savior, rolled into a fleshily convenient package,
CANDY WORLD
Sweeten your mouth! B@stard! Open the lungs of your tounge and breath the sweet taste of an apple for once, or maybe chemicals sweetened towards a cancerous high. Purple, blue, yellow, I give not a smidgen to your cause but moral encompassing: I too eat of the candy, my mouth runt' over with bittersweat delectations. Why do I stress candy? I rather answer with a question: why do you not? Candy: if it rots your teeth, it is the devil in your mouth, tap dancing with the parasites and shuffling down your gums. Candy, candy, candy, sweet but bittersweet, bitter but sweetly sweet. I hate it, it hates me, but gather me in your mind for clarity a dinnerly image, for am it's prey. As I eat it, it eats my soul, and I love it all the more for its raunch and wickedness. Is not this land a Candy World in it's own right?
CHEETOHS
Just moments ago, I ate Cheetohs. And why? They were not particularly good. They were not particularly filling. They were in no way nutritious. They just made me feel like a giant cheese man.
BURGER
What is the Meaning of this thing, this so-called Burger? I have said that it is merely one of many inventions of delicatessen, or rather evolution, that may be sniffed out under the humanic sun, and eated if one dared to eated such a stomach crunching substance as the burger, and its brillo-pad-like ground beef patties. The sum of the term eated, mind you, is such as will hopefully encapsulate the spirit and the sould of this so-called burger, this creeping edible beast that seeks to jump down the tail-pipes of the world's tubing, and clog it all to smithereens. Not that this is a bad thing, or a good thing: I don't know at all. But I am merely an observer -- a watcher -- and at times a doer, like an angel who has far more sense that she or he will allow him or herself to manifest, for fear of ruining the Laughter. I see the burger as the definition of a Global system and culture. If this Global system and culture were an open field, the burger would be a glorious warrior champion, for who the very term "WARMONGER" was created. Burger, or burger, capitalized or not, this creature, made from the infamous cow, and at times beef or tofu or even peanuts mixed with love and ingeniousness, is a bastard and a hero at once, sort of like Brad Pitt's rendition of Achilles. Though I am a liar, I do not digress.
TRANSCENDENTALISM
Transcending what? Where? Who? If Transcendence is a motive, then being is a crime. What do I mean by this? Everything.
SPACE
The Final Frontier... Or is it? Space, is nothingness, occasioned by the gradation of stars scattered throughout. But beyond it all, what wall lies at the Universe's outer dimensions? Is it this wall that blackens the primordial sky, the ultimate heaven, which is the vast expanse of space? Such a frontier can be traversed in the mind, even without practice. The wisdom of the bodily soul is innate and all-powerful. A god resides in us all, a devil as well. Therefore I theorize: parallel dimensions exist within and without, and we fleshy bodies are crude antennas for a viciously transcendental force. I theorize that parallel spaces occupy the conundrums of the physical universe and the metaphysical brainworld, even those which would alter our genetics, and form us eventually into beams of light. And by us I mean we, or rather the you and I collective.
RED
Red. Such a color as red. As all colors should be done, it has been studied. But there needs to be more. This color -- study it, smart men of the world, and women too, for there in its crimson clutches lies the secret of life. Red -- so called color of passion. This color is the hue of lifeblood, and blood as well, lifeblood and blood being separate entities (for those of us who are spiritually deaf). With this red blood, the world may be changed, so far as humanic injustice is concerned, and suffering, and corruption. Red; the color of revolution. Use it and wear it well, for there is none other color so precious and potent, so awe-inspiring in the eyes of sentient beings, as is the so-called vivid color red. Amen.
MATH and THE COLLECTIVE YIMI
Mathematics is a system, sort of like Physics, through which the Universe was engineered. I don't know who did this engineering, but it was a very smart being, or probably something lazily akin in to the definition of the primitive adjective "omnipotent". To know math in the context of an omnipotent understanding, an broad and existentially encompassing eye-view, is to know an subtruth in a way that is unlike the knowing of a trained monkey; to know math is to know the link that is the structure of life, which is essentially the so-called 'meaning' that certain demographics of humans, by cliche design, have tricked themselves into questing. So-called Mathematics, when applied to theories of translation as they apply to the entire perceptual reality of the Collective Yimi (Universe), is but a one of a wide array of available links into the heart of existence.
DEAR WATER
Water -- the Nectar of the Nile. If the Nile were all of creation. Does it pain many to ponder the reality of a bottled watter? Water -- to be bottled is to be enslaved, and you are so liquid and freeforming. Water -- to be package and sold, for the benefit of a few wealthy merchants, is tenamount to treason. Water -- why do you not resist, and revolt, and enlighten the blind? Do you have wishes to be spread out into the deserts? Water, did you betray the peoples of the desert when you fled them, and left them to starve? Water, Dear Water, should I really cry for you, when you have been as shiftless as the rocks? Ever eroding, never corroding, you are never growing, only knowing of your fate. And what is that fate? A fate that is within me; in my confusion I reach conclusions: you are in me as we speak. You are in the lucky -- you are fuel for the decadent. I dearsay, with patience, you will find yourself recycled in the oceans, but what of the now? Ocean-dwelling is little call for revolutions. Or is it? I must declare, that ignorence is bliss, especially so far as your age-old motives are concerned. I digress, but only out of paradox.
LAUGHTER
Laughter -- can a monopoly be run on Laughter? I say yes: it can and it will, for it has, and will always be so long as the world is flat. Laughter is, in these days and in days passed, a dual-coated object. On one layer, it is an honest expression of the ultra-humanic entity, the humor of the humanic possession. On the other layer is a systematic whoring mechanism, an idea of ideologies of complex ulturior motives that generally coincide at the point of exploitation of the emotion as an effective tool of social navigation and, dear I say, manipulation, so far as society and its navigables herin and therin lie. Caulfield -- perhaps he was onto something with his idea of 'phonies' and conformists. Perhaps Caulfied went crazy at the end of Catcher because he had finally succumbed to the cataclismic perceptions and ideas of the masses, or the 'mass', as brainless and puddy-like as it may be. Perhaps Caulfield was meant to soar to greater heights, if only the flatness of this planet had not thrust him down for the last and final count, and the flames of his atmospheric entrance had not sewn shut his optics. Only Almighty entities of inhuman reason will truly ever know, and so will their prophets once again be born, once their ears are kissed open.
DINNER
What is Dinner? Is it something you eat to nourish, or is it something you have been taught to label? Is not eating the act of nourishment of the body, is it it more -- a so-called nourishment of the psyche? When Dinner is used in the aspect of a collective of souls, given in social potency in the transmission of ideas and thinkings, should not your definition of this Dinner be one less constructed of foreign thoughts and ideas? What is not a part is a whole, and what is whole is a part, so far as accumulations and gradations are concerned. If you are not what you eat, perhaps what you eat is what you are. Meaning, if you eat in a manner and of a manner that is part of a historic institution of media monopolies, perhaps your dinner has been prepared by those benefactors, in terms of physical and psychological nourishment. In which case you definitely are what and how you eat, especially given the theory of social transmission. In which case, i would watch what I watch, and what my parent's have watched, and what my children will watch, so as to break any inhumanic cycles.
AEOLEONIC SELF-SACRIFICE
Sometimes there are necessary self-sacrifices in life so far as the Aeoleonic individual is concerned. In general, the Aeoleonic individual is a paradox. Given the nature of paradoxes, we know that a great deal of energy is involved on either sides of the Aeoleonic spectrum -- energies which are in vivid existential opposition, by iminant or preiminant design -- energies who balance each other out, creating a nuetrality of so wide and magnificent a spectrum that it all goes unnoticed to the lay eye -- much akin to the roundness of the earth, which is a roundness that is an everyday flatness to the existance of the lay ground-dweller. Is not the flatness of the ground-dweller's earth and the roundness of the Galaxy's planet a strange and unusual paradox to both eyes, both wise and unwise? Does not this conflict of round-and-flat-ness present a set of factual circumstances that could not be overscribed as a thing irrefutible to perception, and bias, and the threat of centrality and ego? In essence, this is the complex, ever-shifting form of Aeoleonic tendency. When compounded with the symbol of self-sacrifice, an ageless Aeoleonic concept unfolds partly as such:
(--post comic--)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)